This article examines Australia’s National AI Plan, assessing its opportunities, gaps, and global positioning. It explores sovereign capability, workforce impact, infrastructure investment, and regulatory readiness - highlighting what must happen next to translate ambition into accountable, nationally competitive AI execution. The analysis is authored by Su Jella, a globally recognised leader in data, AI, and digital strategy.
In December 2025, Australia's National AI Plan was launched, shifting the national conversation from cautious contemplation to strategic operationalisation. It’s the blueprint we’ve been waiting for, a clear signal to move from the "incubation" of ideas to the accelerated adoption of AI across all sectors.
The plan is structured around three critical pillars: capturing the opportunities, spreading the benefits, and keeping us safe. While it represents a vital first step in setting national direction, its success hinges on its ability to overcome some significant, globally divergent challenges.
The initial disappointment is palpable: the plan did not arrive with major new funding allocations in the Federal Budget. In the global AI arms race, this lack of immediate, dedicated capital is a definite hurdle.
However, the plan's existence itself is a powerful lever. It provides the necessary strategic justification to push for the crucial investment, policy reform, and, most importantly, the widespread AI literacy that our economy requires. This is not just theoretical; the potential payoff is significant:
The Technology Council of Australia (TCA) forecasts that the development and adoption of AI has the potential to create up to 200,000 AI-related jobs in Australia by 2030.
The question isn't if AI will transform our economy, but whether we're ready to seize this enormous workforce opportunity. This blueprint is the essential starting line.
Comparison of Australia’s AI Plan against global leaders in AI
The new Australian plan makes a clear strategic pitch:
This linkage of data centre investment with our renewable energy transition is arguably the plan’s most innovative strategic move. It transforms a liability (massive energy consumption) into a competitive selling point for international capital.
Here is where the plan is weak and out of step with global counterparts.
The government has opted for a "light-touch" approach, rejecting a standalone, mandatory AI Act. Instead, it relies on clarifying and strengthening existing laws (privacy, consumer protection, etc.) and issuing voluntary guidance, supported by a new, $30 million AI Safety Institute (AISI). This body is the only dedicated mechanism designed to keep pace with:
This regulatory timidity is a stark divergence: ignoring the public's desire for strong guardrails is a huge oversight. The question of how we effectively penalise bad actors and cybercrime as they scale exponentially in an AI-driven world remains unresolved if regulation is not specifically updated. This soft approach risks creating an ethical data imperative vacuum - where the call for ethical AI practices is not met with sufficient, accountable governance.
The global environment is no longer just talking about better large language models or generative AI; the conversation is now also shifting towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and Quantum Computing. With experts suggesting AGI could plausibly emerge between 2030 and 2040, or even sooner, the stakes for governance have skyrocketed.
While the National AI Plan wisely delegates the nuts and bolts of quantum development to the separate National Quantum Strategy, the evolution of AI and AGI are intrinsically linked to compute power. Quantum, with its promise of exponentially faster processing, will be the fuel for AGI's engine.
This fusion presents the ultimate security challenge. Both capabilities are linked to profound risks in cyber security - like breaking existing encryption - and potential systemic harms. While the plan is largely focused on the economic and social deployment of current Generative AI, it cannot exclude future focus on areas like Quantum and AGI. Progress in frontier AI cannot be sustained without sufficient, accountable guardrails. Relying on an agency (AISI) to simply monitor these technologies, while simultaneously rejecting mandatory regulation, places a monumental burden on a single body. The plan needs a greater drive to ensure our light-touch policies are actively and collaboratively managed in concert with the binding regulatory mandates emerging globally, particularly as we move closer to a quantum-powered, general-purpose AI future.
The plan rightly champions upskilling and education to ensure an AI-ready workforce. The focus, however, should be on augmentation and not replacement. The plan needs to drive a greater call for protecting human jobs and consulting with workers about AI's impact on their roles and conditions.
Beyond jobs, two critical areas need more specificity:
This plan is a start - a necessary blueprint - but it's a foundation, not a finished skyscraper. We now have the framework to accelerate our future, but the next phase requires a united push from industry, unions, and the public to ensure:
The race is on. We have a blueprint, but let's use it to accelerate our future - responsibly, inclusively, and with the courage to regulate where global leadership demands it.
Access the National AI Plan.
Supporting references:
Experts at the University of Melbourne: Australia’s national AI plan has just been released. Who exactly will benefit?
#AustralianAI #NationalAIPlan #FutureOfWork #AILiteracy #TechPolicy #Innovation #DigitalTransformation
Su Jella (MAICD, MBA) is a distinguished digital, data and AI luminary who excels at navigating and transforming complexity into definitive competitive advantage. As a strategist and leader situated at the nexus of the global AI and data revolution, she architecturally empowers enterprises to realise their data assets - turning ambiguous potential into governed, high-impact strategic execution.
Her intellectual authority is validated by unparalleled global recognition and her status as a sought-after global speaker and leader. She is a designated multi-award leader (Top 50 & 100 Global leaders), notably also bestowed the Winner - Global Women in Tech and Women in AI (Asia Pacific) award and recognised among the Top 25 Leaders in Australia. Furthermore, her seminal thought leadership earned her permanent inclusion in the US Federal Congress Library as co-author of The AI Revolution.
To cultivate exponential, governed growth and operational mastery, Su provides a validated blueprint for securing market leadership in the data and AI age and continues to drive her thought leadership and strategic delivery in this evolving ecosystem.
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/sujella
Su Jella is a speaker at CDAO Sydney 2026. Interested in learning more about Data? Join us at CDAO Sydney this March!
Also don't miss Data & AI Architecture Sydney and Enterprise AI Sydney, happening in the same space as CDAO Sydney!
Main image credit: Generative AI image prompt: Su Jella